Davide Commission

Also known as: Fact-Finding Commission — the statutory designation under Republic Act No. 6832 · Davide Commission — the popular name drawn from its chairman · Fact-Finding Commission on the December 1, 1989 coup attempt — the styling used in this wiki's entry on Hilario Davide Jr. · Presidential Commission to Conduct a Fact-Finding Investigation of the 1989 Rebellion — the Administrative Order No. 146 designation of its predecessor body

Government

Definition

The Davide Commission — formally the Fact-Finding Commission created by Republic Act No. 6832, approved January 5, 1990 — was the independent commission that investigated the failed coup d’état of December 1989 against the government of President Corazon Aquino, the bloodiest mutiny of the Aquino years, and recommended measures against its recurrence. (LawPhil — RA 6832) It carried forward a presidential body created a month earlier by Administrative Order No. 146 (December 6, 1989), “Creating a Presidential Commission to Conduct a Fact-Finding Investigation of the 1989 Rebellion,” whose records and facilities Section 14 of the statute transferred to the new commission. (LawPhil — AO 146, LawPhil — RA 6832) The Administrative Order named Hilario G. Davide Jr., then Chairman of the Commission on Elections, as chairman, with Ricardo J. Romulo, Leonardo Z. Legaspi, Carolina G. Hernandez, and Delfin L. Lazaro as members — the bench that continued under the statute’s design of a chairman and four members appointed by the President. (LawPhil — AO 146, LawPhil — RA 6832) The chairmanship cut short Davide’s COMELEC tenure of February 15, 1988 to January 12, 1990, the dates this wiki’s entry on Hilario Davide Jr. documents. (Wikipedia — Hilario Davide Jr.)

The statute directed the commission to investigate “all the facts and circumstances of the failed coup d’état of December 1989,” including the involvement of military personnel and civilian personalities, among them public officials and employees, and armed it with the tools of a court of inquiry — witness summonses, subpoenas, Monetary Board leave to examine coup-linked bank accounts, and referral of criminal evidence to the prosecutors. (LawPhil — RA 6832) The commission reported within the one year the law allowed: its Final Report, carried in the Official Gazette edition of October 3, 1990, became known as the Davide Commission Report, and the body went functus officio two months after the reporting period closed. (Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt, LawPhil — RA 6832) The report’s reform program — a civilian national police, a crackdown on military corruption, performance reviews of appointive officials, reform of military promotions, a review of election laws before 1992, and a clear statement from Aquino on re-election in 1992 — saw its police pillar enacted before 1990 ended, in Republic Act No. 6975. (Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt, LawPhil — RA 6975)

Identities

Authority	Value
Wikipedia	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davide_Commission (a redirect to the 1989 Philippine coup attempt article, which carries the commission’s record)
Wikidata	N/A
DBpedia	N/A
ProductOntology	N/A
Wiktionary	N/A
Library of Congress Subject Headings	N/A
MeSH	N/A
NCBI Taxonomy	N/A
AGROVOC	N/A
Google Scholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Davide+Commission%22
ConceptNet	N/A
OpenCyc	N/A

Also Known As

Fact-Finding Commission — the statutory designation under Republic Act No. 6832
Davide Commission — the popular name drawn from its chairman
Fact-Finding Commission on the December 1, 1989 coup attempt — the styling used in this wiki’s entry on Hilario Davide Jr.
Presidential Commission to Conduct a Fact-Finding Investigation of the 1989 Rebellion — the Administrative Order No. 146 designation of its predecessor body

Examples and Analogies

A commission built in two steps: President Aquino acted first by executive instrument — Administrative Order No. 146 of December 6, 1989, six days before the last surrender at Mactan — and Congress then converted the inquiry into a statutory body with compulsion powers, records transfer, and a fixed life. (LawPhil — AO 146, LawPhil — RA 6832)
The inquiry that swallowed its predecessors: the commission did not limit itself to December 1989; its Final Report reached back through the coup series — its findings on the November 1986 “God Save the Queen” plot, at pages 149 to 155 of the report, supplied the adjudicated record of that earlier conspiracy. (Wikipedia — God Save the Queen Plot)
Verified organizational data:
Predecessor instrument: Administrative Order No. 146, December 6, 1989, signed by President Corazon C. Aquino
Statutory instrument: Republic Act No. 6832, approved January 5, 1990; P10 million appropriated from the Contingent Fund
Composition: a chairman and four members appointed by the President; the Administrative Order No. 146 bench — Hilario G. Davide Jr. (chairman), Ricardo J. Romulo, Leonardo Z. Legaspi, Carolina G. Hernandez, and Delfin L. Lazaro
Powers: summon witnesses, administer oaths, issue subpoenas, examine bank accounts with Monetary Board authority, refer evidence to prosecutors; direct contempt punishable by fine up to P5,000 and/or imprisonment up to 30 days
Report: Final Report, Official Gazette edition of October 3, 1990, to the President, the Congress, and other appropriate authorities; functus officio two months after the one-year period
Principal realized recommendation: Republic Act No. 6975 (December 13, 1990) — the Philippine National Police under the Department of the Interior and Local Government, the Philippine Constabulary–Integrated National Police abolished

Usage Scenarios

1. Researching Post-1986 Civil–Military Reform

Scholars of the Aquino-era coups treat the commission’s record as the official register of the December 1989 attempt — creation instruments, findings, and the reform program that followed — the sequence this wiki’s entry on the 1989 Philippine Coup Attempt documents. (Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt, LawPhil — RA 6832)

2. Studying Commissions of Inquiry as Legal Instruments

The commission is a Philippine case study in the commission-of-inquiry form, and in Davide’s career it is the first of two truth-seeking chairmanships, the second being the 2010 Philippine Truth Commission that the Supreme Court struck down, the record this wiki’s entry on Hilario Davide Jr. carries. (LawPhil — RA 6832, Wikipedia — Hilario Davide Jr.)

3. Citing the Coup Era’s Adjudicated Aftermath

For the accountability record, the commission’s referrals to prosecutors sit on one side and the amnesties on the other — Proclamation No. 723 (May 17, 1996) for the RAM–SFP–YOU signatories of the October 13, 1995 peace agreement, covering acts from February 22, 1986 to December 23, 1992, and Proclamation No. 724 (same date) extending the general amnesty to acts on or before June 1, 1995. (LawPhil — Proc 723, LawPhil — Proc 724)

Strategies

Anchor every claim in the instruments: the Administrative Order, the statute, and the report’s publication date fix the commission’s life — December 6, 1989 to its functus officio in early 1991 — and keep the body distinct from the coup it studied. (LawPhil — AO 146, LawPhil — RA 6832)
Read the root-cause findings as testimony: the report recorded that coup participants blamed graft and corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and the lenient treatment of communist insurgents — grievances of the mutineers themselves, not the commission’s own causal verdict, a distinction careful citation preserves. (Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)
Trace recommendations to enactment: the civilian-police recommendation became Republic Act No. 6975 within months; the election-law review and the demand for Aquino’s 1992 declaration were political questions the report could pose but not settle. (LawPhil — RA 6975, Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)
For researchers: date Davide’s departure from the Commission on Elections to January 12, 1990 and his elevation to the Supreme Court to January 24, 1991 — the commission chairmanship sits precisely between the two offices. (Wikipedia — Hilario Davide Jr.)

Security and Safety Measures

Compulsion with due process: the commission could compel testimony and documents and punish direct contempt with a fine up to P5,000 or imprisonment up to 30 days, with indirect contempt under Rule 71 of the Revised Rules of Court. (LawPhil — RA 6832)
Checks on the inquisitor: bank examination required Monetary Board leave, and evidence of criminal liability was referred to the prosecutors rather than adjudicated by the commission — fact-finding held separate from prosecution. (LawPhil — RA 6832)
A fixed life: the reporting deadline and the two-month functus officio clause prevented the emergency inquiry from becoming a standing tribunal — a safeguard against open-ended investigative power. (LawPhil — RA 6832)
Continuity of records: Section 14’s transfer of the Administrative Order No. 146 commission’s records and facilities preserved the inquiry’s paper trail under the statutory body. (LawPhil — RA 6832)

Historical Context

The commission was born of the gravest crisis of the restored democratic government. The December 1–9, 1989 coup attempt — mounted by the Reform the Armed Forces Movement under Gregorio Honasan with Marcos loyalist units, at an official cost of 99 dead and 570 wounded, the record this wiki’s entry on the 1989 Philippine Coup Attempt carries — ended with the government standing and the political system shaken. Six days before the last surrender at Mactan, Aquino signed Administrative Order No. 146; on January 5, 1990 Congress followed with Republic Act No. 6832, its contempt power, P10 million appropriation, and one-year mandate. (LawPhil — AO 146, LawPhil — RA 6832, Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)

The Final Report reconstructed not only the December 1989 attempt but the coup series that began with the plots of 1986; its finding that Juan Ponce Enrile and RAM members were the primary instigators of the November 1986 “God Save the Queen” conspiracy is drawn from the report’s pages 149 to 155. (Wikipedia — God Save the Queen Plot) The report’s principal structural recommendation was enacted almost at once: Republic Act No. 6975 of December 13, 1990 established the Philippine National Police under a reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government and provided that the Philippine Constabulary and the Integrated National Police “shall cease to exist” — the civilian-police answer this wiki’s entries on those forces record. (LawPhil — RA 6975) Davide himself moved on January 24, 1991 to the Supreme Court as Associate Justice. (Wikipedia — Hilario Davide Jr.)

The accountability the commission’s referrals began, the political process later closed: Proclamation No. 723 of May 17, 1996 granted amnesty to RAM–SFP–YOU members and supporters for crimes in pursuit of political beliefs between February 22, 1986 and December 23, 1992, pursuant to the General Agreement on Peace of October 13, 1995, and Proclamation No. 724, issued the same day, extended the general amnesty to acts committed on or before June 1, 1995. (LawPhil — Proc 723, LawPhil — Proc 724)

Challenges and Controversies

Fact-Finding Versus Adjudication

The commission could establish facts, refer evidence, and name involvement — but it could not convict. Its design left the criminal reckoning to prosecutors and courts, and the amnesties of 1994 to 1996 overtook much of that reckoning, the tension this wiki’s entry on the 1989 Philippine Coup Attempt examines under amnesty versus accountability. (LawPhil — RA 6832, LawPhil — Proc 723)

The Report’s Causal Frame

The root causes the report emphasized — graft and corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and lenient treatment of communist insurgents — were the grievances the coup participants themselves offered. The risk of letting mutineers define the problem they claimed to be solving is the standing criticism; the report preserves the testimony, not a settled causal verdict. (Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)

Implementation, Enacted and Political

One pillar of the program — the civilian national police — reached the statute books within the commission’s own lifetime as Republic Act No. 6975. The others were political: the review of election laws before 1992 and the demand that Aquino declare whether she would seek re-election were addressed to actors, not draftsmen, and their fate belonged to the 1991–1992 succession contest. (LawPhil — RA 6975, Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)

The Question of an Earlier Commission

No standing commission investigated the August 28, 1987 coup attempt at the time; that attempt’s adjudicated record consists of the courts-martial and prosecutions this wiki’s entry on the August 1987 Philippine coup attempt documents, while the Davide Commission’s 1990 report became the first official narrative to reach across the whole 1986–1989 series, including the plot investigations of 1986. (Wikipedia — God Save the Queen Plot, Wikipedia — 1989 Philippine coup attempt)